6

I understand that as of the last hard fork, the minimum mixin has been changed from 0 to 2. However, is this an effective baseline? Or is there a higher selection that users can or should choose that would ideally guarantee a private transaction?

4

There can be no such thing, because "private" is not well defined. Even if you were to ring sign against every single other output on the chain, everybody doesn't use Monero, right ? Moreover, there is a difference beteen untraceability and unlinkability, and more (tracking first relaying node, etc). Different facets with different solutions.

Generally, the higher the mixin, the larger the anonimity set. However, when you start getting into the less used mixins, such as 73 or 352, two transactions using mixin 73 will be likely to be sent by the same wallet. This may be an argument for quantizing mixin values.

As an aside, the wallet default mixin is 4, which provides more privacy than the bare minimum allowed by the network.

It is probable that minimum mixin will be increased in one of the next few forks, since this was one of the recommendations of https://lab.getmonero.org/pubs/MRL-0004.pdf.

  • If the we only use powers of 2 as mixin value, there's inherently a limited set of possible mixin values used. Wouldn't that solve the issue of bizarre mixin values sticking out? – dpzz Jan 6 '17 at 0:35
  • It would, more or less. – user36303 Jan 6 '17 at 12:26
  • For those looking into how "ringsize" is specified in the actual code: HF_VERSION_MIN_MIXIN_4 with the value 6 indicates that minimum mixin will be "4" after hardfork number "6". The actual code defining the minimum is here. – Jonathan Cross Oct 22 '17 at 18:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.