Timeline for Is there a minimum effective mixin?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2017 at 18:11 | comment | added | Jonathan Cross |
For those looking into how "ringsize" is specified in the actual code: HF_VERSION_MIN_MIXIN_4 with the value 6 indicates that minimum mixin will be "4" after hardfork number "6". The actual code defining the minimum is here.
|
|
| Jan 6, 2017 at 12:26 | comment | added | user36303 | It would, more or less. | |
| Jan 6, 2017 at 0:35 | comment | added | dpzz | If the we only use powers of 2 as mixin value, there's inherently a limited set of possible mixin values used. Wouldn't that solve the issue of bizarre mixin values sticking out? | |
| Aug 3, 2016 at 12:04 | vote | accept | cardboardoranges | ||
| Aug 3, 2016 at 11:48 | history | answered | user36303 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |