I was reading something written by a community member SamsungGalaxyPlayer, where they mention casually that "decoys" are the new name for "mixins".
First time I've heard that. Can someone confirm and tell me why or when it happened?

Full quote:

Transactions with zero decoys (previously named "mixins") have no ring signature protection. This is self-evident.

from getmonero.org


There's no "official" anything. The term appeared about 1.5 yrs ago and it has since caught on. Many share the thought that "mixin" is misleading.

In the "official" software, mixin got replaced with ringsize (=mixin+1)

See also: Mixin vs Ring Size

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Additionally, I don't think "mixins" where called mixins in the first place. I've always seen "mixin" used as a property of ring signatures, not a name for the fake outputs. – user36303 May 30 '18 at 21:18
  • Thanks so much. The terminology can get very confusing. – begs-the-hessian May 31 '18 at 10:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.