Are there any perks to doing it like this? Why not just start off with enforcing mixin of 4 at the beginning?


One of the reasons (maybe the only one, even) could be that without RCT, a transaction's size would grow significantly when mixin is increased, because any non-round amount needs to be split into many denominated outputs and each of those is 'mixin-ed'.

Even though the default is 4, I believe that many exhanges and pools - who do a lot of transactions - would prefer using the 2, until RCT is enabled.

With RCT, we get a one-time bump in TX size, but we can increase the mixin more cheaply because there will usually be just 1 or 2 outputs as we don't have to split into denominations anymore.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.