Skip to main content
Monero

Return to Answer

added 165 characters in body
Source Link
user4
user4

I have an XFX R9 390 and Claymore gets me 775 h/s while. Minus dev shares, that's 755 h/s. Wolf's throws up errors: (A) "Error code -1: Low Difficulty Share"gets 760 h/s, which is actually higher than Claymore. That said, I found the "workunit" "thread" "Rawintensity" etc settings of Wolf's miner difficult to understand, so Claymore's is much easier all around to install and (B) "Rejected Shares: (null)"use.

I have an R9 390 and Claymore gets me 775 h/s while Wolf's throws up errors: (A) "Error code -1: Low Difficulty Share" and (B) "Rejected Shares: (null)"

I have an XFX R9 390 and Claymore gets me 775 h/s. Minus dev shares, that's 755 h/s. Wolf's gets 760 h/s, which is actually higher than Claymore. That said, I found the "workunit" "thread" "Rawintensity" etc settings of Wolf's miner difficult to understand, so Claymore's is much easier all around to install and use.

Source Link
user4
user4

I have an R9 390 and Claymore gets me 775 h/s while Wolf's throws up errors: (A) "Error code -1: Low Difficulty Share" and (B) "Rejected Shares: (null)"